Variant VAR_048095

Phenotypic summary of VAR_048095
Compact overview of VAR_048095
UniProt IDGeneMutationMutation typeDiseaseOMIMdbSNP
1433S_HUMANSFNM155IPolymorphism-No OMIM entryrs11542705
Short stretch summary of VAR_048095
PredictorPredicted regions overviewComparison to WTStretches in variantStretches in WT
Tango 0
No change
22
Waltz 37
No change
21
Limbo 0
No change
33
Domain composition of 1433S_HUMAN
DatabaseDomain compositionResidue details
PFAM14-3-3 (Residues 3-238)
SMART14_3_3 (Residues 3-244)
Structure stability summary of VAR_048095
VariantStability changeEffectStructureStability frequency histogram
M155I0.52 kcal/mol
Slightly reduced stability

TANGO aggregation

Graphical comparison of TANGO regions in variant and wild type
ProteinPredicted regions overviewTANGO regionsTotal score
Variant2332
Wild type2332
TANGO regions in wild type and variant
Wild type TANGO regions
N-term gatekeepersTANGO regionC-term gatekeepersStartEndScore
PIRLGLALNFSVFHYEIA17217920
SYKDSTLIMQLLRDNLT21722316
Variant protein TANGO regions
N-term gatekeepersTANGO regionC-term gatekeepersStartEndScore
PIRLGLALNFSVFHYEIA17217920
SYKDSTLIMQLLRDNLT21722316
Difference in TANGO aggregation between wild type and variant


This graph plots the per-residue TANGO aggregation score difference between the wild type protein and this variant.
From left to right, all residue TANGO score differences from the N-terminus to the C-terminus are plotted.
A flat line indicates that the variant does not alter the aggregation profile of the protein.
Positive peaks indicate increased aggregation tendency due to this variant.
Negative peaks indicate decreased aggregation tendency due to this variant.


TANGO aggregation profile score plot


This graph plots the per-residue TANGO aggregation score of the variant protein. From left to right, all residue scores from the N-terminus to the C-terminus are plotted


Molecular visualization of TANGO aggregation-prone regions

Wild type 1433S_HUMAN

Variant VAR_048095

These two molecular images show the TANGO aggregation-prone regions as red colored segments. The left image represents the wild type protein, the right represents the variant protein.
If both images are the same, it implies that the introduced variant amino acid does not alter the TANGO aggregation tendency. In any other case, the images allow structural interpretation of gained or lost aggregation-prone regions due to the variant amino acid.
The structural location of the variant residue is colored in yellow. Click on the images to get a larger view and to download the original.

WALTZ amylogenicity

Graphical comparison of WALTZ regions in variant and wild type
ProteinPredicted regions overviewWALTZ regionsTotal score
Variant2191
Wild type1154
WALTZ regions in wild type and variant
Wild type WALTZ regions
N-term gatekeepersWALTZ regionC-term gatekeepersStartEndScore
PIRLGLALNFSVFHYE17217719
Variant protein WALTZ regions
N-term gatekeepersWALTZ regionC-term gatekeepersStartEndScore
SARSAYQEAIDISKKE1511566
PIRLGLALNFSVFHYE17217719
Difference in WALTZ amylogenicity between wild type and variant


This graph plots the per-residue WALTZ amylogenic score difference between the wild type protein and this variant.
From left to right, all residue WALTZ score differences from the N-terminus to the C-terminus are plotted.
A flat line indicates that the variant does not alter the amylogenic profile of the protein.
Positive peaks indicate increased amylogenic tendency due to this variant.
Negative peaks indicate decreased amylogenic tendency due to this variant.


WALTZ amylogenic profile score plot


This graph plots the per-residue WALTZ amylogenic score of the variant protein. From left to right, all residue scores from the N-terminus to the C-terminus are plotted


Molecular visualization of WALTZ amylogenic regions

Wild type 1433S_HUMAN

Variant VAR_048095

These two molecular images show the WALTZ amylogenic regions as blue colored segments. The left image represents the wild type protein, the right represents the variant protein.
If both images are the same, it implies that the introduced variant amino acid does not alter the WALTZ amyloid-forming tendency. In any other case, the images allow structural interpretation of gained or lost amylogenic regions due to the variant amino acid.
The structural location of the variant residue is colored in yellow. Click on the images to get a larger view and to download the original.

LIMBO chaperone binding

Graphical comparison of LIMBO regions in variant and wild type
ProteinPredicted regions overviewLIMBO regionsTotal score
Variant32400
Wild type32400
LIMBO regions in wild type and variant
Wild type LIMBO regions
N-term gatekeepersWALTZ regionC-term gatekeepersStartEndScore
QRAAWRVLSSIEQKSNEE6067100
AESRVFYLKMKGDYYRYLAEVATGDD11913449
QLLRDNLTLWTADNAGEE226233100
Variant protein LIMBO regions
N-term gatekeepersWALTZ regionC-term gatekeepersStartEndScore
QRAAWRVLSSIEQKSNEE6067100
AESRVFYLKMKGDYYRYLAEVATGDD11913449
QLLRDNLTLWTADNAGEE226233100
Difference in LIMBO chaperone binding between wild type and variant


This graph plots the per-residue LIMBO chaperone binding difference between the wild type protein and this variant.
From left to right, all residue LIMBO score differences from the N-terminus to the C-terminus are plotted.
A flat line indicates that the variant does not alter the chaperone binding profile of the protein.
Positive peaks indicate increased predicted chaperone binding due to this variant.
Negative peaks indicate decreased predicted chaperone binding due to this variant.


LIMBO chaperone binding score plot


This graph plots the per-residue LIMBO chaperone binding score of the variant protein. From left to right, all residue scores from the N-terminus to the C-terminus are plotted


Molecular visualization of LIMBO chaperone binding regions

Wild type 1433S_HUMAN

Variant VAR_048095

These two molecular images show the LIMBO chaperone binding regions as magenta colored segments. The left image represents the wild type protein, the right represents the variant protein.
If both images are the same, it implies that the introduced variant amino acid does not alter the LIMBO chaperone binding properties. In any other case, the images allow structural interpretation of gained or lost chaperone binding regions due to the variant amino acid.
The structural location of the variant residue is colored in yellow. Click on the images to get a larger view and to download the original.

FOLDX structural profile

There is currently no structural information available to make the required analyses.

Functional sites, structural features and cellular processing

Functional sites and structural features
FeatureThis residue
Catalytic siteNo
Secondary structureHELIX
Transmembrane topologyNo TM regions in this protein
Cellular processing
FeatureAffected by variant
Signal peptideNo
Farnesylation anchorNo
N-Myristoylation anchorNo
Geranylgeranyl transferase Type 1 anchorNo
Geranylgeranyl transferase Type 2 anchorNo
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchorNo
Peroxisomal targeting signal PTS1No
Subcellular locationNo

All mutations from 1433S_HUMAN

1 mutations listed

Variant UniProt ID Mutation Disease Mutation Type dTANGO dWALTZ dLIMBO ddG
VAR_048095 1433S_HUMAN M155I - Polymorphism 0 37 0 0.52
Comma Separated Values documentMicrosoft Excel document